Types of Proceedings
Extradition Law (Overview) Stopping an Extradition European Arrest Warrant International Arrest Warrant Extradition Detention Interpol & Red Notice SIS Alert Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Mutual Legal Assistance
About
Attorney Meyer The Law Firm Fees Results
Information
Glossary Countries A–Z First Aid News FAQ
Emergency · +49 171 4075758
Call24/7

Results before the Federal Constitutional Court

Last updated: July 2026

In five proceedings the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfG) ruled in favor of the complainants — with a total of eight decisions documented here, from interim injunctions to rulings on the merits. I pursued the constitutional complaints partly for my own clients and partly as the author of the complaint for colleagues. Extraditions to Russia and Romania were stopped, and the challenged decisions of the Higher Regional Courts (Oberlandesgerichte, OLG) were set aside. The decisions are publicly available; here they are anonymized, each with the official case number as evidence.

First assessment free of charge & without obligation Confidential from the first call
Building of the Schleswig Higher Regional Court
Schleswig Higher Regional Court — the court of origin in the proceedings shown here.

Five successful Constitutional Court proceedings

The focus of my constitutional complaints in extradition law: the threat of detention conditions incompatible with human dignity (Article 4 of the EU Charter / Article 3 ECHR) and political persecution — pursued to the last instance, the Federal Constitutional Court.

Russia · political persecution

Extradition of a complainant of Chechen origin to Russia for criminal prosecution. Grounds raised: the threat of political persecution and deficits in effective legal protection.

→ Constitutional complaint successful: the OLG's admissibility decision was set aside (Article 19(4) Basic Law) and the matter referred back.

BVerfG, decision of 22 Oct 2019 — 2 BvR 1661/19 · OLG Schleswig-Holstein
Romania · detention incompatible with human dignity

Extradition for the enforcement of a sentence on the basis of a European Arrest Warrant. Grounds raised: the threat of detention conditions below the minimum standard required by EU fundamental rights (cell size).

→ Constitutional complaint successful: extradition stopped on grounds of Article 4 of the EU Charter / Article 3 ECHR.

BVerfG, decision of 18 Aug 2021 — 2 BvR 908/21 · OLG Schleswig-Holstein
Romania · ECJ referral

The threat of placement in a shared cell with only around 2 m² of personal floor space — a possible violation of human dignity (Article 1(1) Basic Law), linked to the question of a referral to the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

→ Constitutional complaint successful: surrender initially stopped by interim injunction; the OLG's decision was then set aside — violation of the right to the lawful judge (Article 101(1) sentence 2 Basic Law) due to the failure to refer the case to the ECJ.

BVerfG, interim injunction of 12 Jan 2018; chamber decision on the merits of 9 May 2018 — 2 BvR 37/18 · OLG Schleswig-Holstein
Romania · detention conditions (EAW)

A further extradition for the enforcement of a sentence (European Arrest Warrant). Here too, the detention conditions to be expected in the target state were at the center of attention.

→ Constitutional complaint successful: surrender initially stopped by interim injunction; the OLG's extradition decision was then set aside — violation of Article 4 of the EU Charter (insufficient overall assessment of the detention conditions).

BVerfG, interim injunction of 24 Jul 2020; chamber decision on the merits of 14 Jan 2021 — 2 BvR 1285/20 · OLG Schleswig-Holstein
Russia · interim relief

Extradition to Russia for criminal prosecution. The Federal Constitutional Court stopped the surrender by interim injunction; after the OLG had ruled again (Section 33a StPO), Karlsruhe stopped the surrender a second time — in the follow-up proceedings 2 BvR 1661/19.

→ Interim injunction: surrender prohibited. After the OLG had ruled again, the BVerfG set aside that decision as well (decision of 22 Oct 2019 — 2 BvR 1661/19, see above). The proceedings in 2 BvR 894/19 were then discontinued — with full reimbursement of expenses by the State, as with a successful constitutional complaint.

BVerfG, interim injunction of 24 Jun 2019; discontinuation and expenses decision of 22 Nov 2019 — 2 BvR 894/19 · OLG Schleswig-Holstein

The proceedings presented here are anonymized; the underlying decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court are officially published and can be retrieved under the respective case number. Results in individual proceedings allow no conclusions to be drawn about the outcome of future proceedings — each case is assessed individually. An interim injunction safeguards the proceedings; it is not a final decision on the merits.

Even the last instance is an option

There is no ordinary appeal against the admissibility decision of the Higher Regional Court — but there is the constitutional complaint to the Federal Constitutional Court, often combined with an urgent application that stops the execution. What matters is preparing all objections early and on solid ground. That is exactly what my defense is geared toward.

Learn more: Stopping an Extradition · European Arrest Warrant · Glossary: Constitutional complaint · About

24/7 Emergency

Fend off an extradition — let's talk about it

Call me — the first assessment is free of charge and without obligation.

+49 171 4075758
Office: +49 431 25939452
Book an appointment