Types of Proceedings
Extradition Law (Overview) Stopping an Extradition European Arrest Warrant International Arrest Warrant Extradition Detention Interpol & Red Notice SIS Alert Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Mutual Legal Assistance
About
Attorney Meyer The Law Firm Fees Results Contact
Information
Glossary Countries A–Z First Aid News FAQ
Emergency · +49 171 4075758
Call24/7

Detention Review in Extradition Proceedings

Last updated: July 2026

The detention review in extradition proceedings is governed by Section 26 IRG. The requested person may apply for a detention review before the competent Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht, OLG) at any time. Independently of this, the OLG is obliged to review the continuation of extradition detention of its own motion at regular intervals.

Standard of review

In the detention review, the OLG examines whether the formal requirements of the extradition arrest warrant are still met, whether the grounds for detention (risk of flight, risk of collusion) continue to exist, whether the extradition detention is proportionate — in particular where proceedings have been lengthy — and whether suspension of detention is an option.

Expedition principle

The Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfG) has repeatedly emphasized the expedition principle in extradition matters: the longer the period of detention, the higher the requirements for justifying continued detention. Delays in the extradition proceedings for which the requested person is not responsible can call the proportionality of continued detention into question.

Oral hearing

The requested person has the right to be heard in the detention review proceedings. On request, the hearing may be conducted as an oral hearing. The defense lawyer can bring all arguments relevant to detention — including new findings on bars to extradition — into the detention review.

Detention review every two months

Under Section 26(1) IRG, the Higher Regional Court reviews the continuation of extradition detention of its own motion once the requested person has been in detention for a total of two months; the review is repeated every two months (Section 26(1) sentence 2 IRG). The IRG does not set a fixed statutory maximum period — however, under the case law of the Federal Constitutional Court, the requirements for justifying continued detention increase as the detention goes on.

← Back to the glossary index

Advice

Questions about extradition proceedings?

I am available 24/7.

+49 171 4075758
Office: +49 431 25939452
Book an appointment