Proportionality as a Bar to Extradition
Last updated: June 2026
Legal basis
The principle of proportionality (Article 20(3) of the Basic Law, Article 49(3) of the EU Charter) also applies in extradition law. In EAW law it is expressly anchored in Article 4a and the recitals of the Framework Decision; in national extradition law it follows from the rule-of-law principle. The Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht, OLG) reviews it within the framework of Section 73 IRG and the relevant special provisions.
Case groups
Typical constellations in which proportionality is reviewed: (1) minor offenses — a low sentence weighed against the heavy burden of extradition (being torn from social ties, small children, illness); (2) lapse of time — a long interval between the offense and the request where the person has integrated in Germany in the meantime; (3) prosecution in Germany — where Germany could prosecute the offense itself; (4) health circumstances — unfitness for detention, serious illness.
Case law of the ECJ
In Radu (C-396/11) and Aranyosi/Căldăraru (C-404/15) the European Court of Justice (ECJ) made clear that fundamental rights can justify refusing an EAW. At the national level, the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfG) has repeatedly stressed that the Higher Regional Court must take all relevant circumstances — including personal ones — into account in its proportionality review.
Questions about extradition proceedings?
I am available 24/7.